Mail Archive of the old Santa Clara Valley Lutheran Parish

Subject: Re: [SCVLP] Meeting

Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:48:11 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>

X-Received: by 10.66.251.70 with SMTP id zi6mr4818202pac.37.1399484892364;
        Wed, 07 May 2014 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: scvlp@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.43.135 with SMTP id w7ls417461igl.25.canary; Wed, 07 May
 2014 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.42.155.137 with SMTP id u9mr4471194icw.12.1399484891914;
        Wed, 07 May 2014 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net. [209.86.89.62])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k3si788208qcn.2.2014.05.07.10.48.11
        for <scvlp@googlegroups.com>;
        Wed, 07 May 2014 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: randy_presuhn@mindspring.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=209.86.89.62;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: randy_presuhn@mindspring.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=randy_presuhn@mindspring.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com;
  b=NX4iEC7EedwdYgM/lSF9LRQxIsJJxe9bU511s0/eFzs0LyJnYS18OVcvmiYMuKo6;
  h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [209.86.224.50] (helo=mswamui-swiss.atl.sa.earthlink.net)
	by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>)
	id 1Wi5wx-0001yE-LW
	for scvlp@googlegroups.com; Wed, 07 May 2014 13:48:11 -0400
Received: from 99.7.137.127 by webmail.earthlink.net with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 13:48:11 -0400
Message-ID: <31740962.1399484891589.JavaMail.root@mswamui-swiss.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:48:11 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Reply-To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: scvlp@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SCVLP] Meeting
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d88891b749bef7332bbca7d3e9f84a9e945edb13905a2b101c7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.50

Hi -

>From: John Goldstein <johngold9@gmail.com>
>Sent: May 7, 2014 10:00 AM
>To: Santa Clara Parish Conference <scvlp@googlegroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [SCVLP] Meeting
>
>Just a comment.
>
>If we received a copy of the emails we send out to t he
>Conference as recipient as well as sender there would be
>a sense of reassurance that the mail was received.

Many mailing list packages offer that option, usually
on a subscriber-by-subscriber basis.

Google Groups, however, does not, as far as I can tell.
If anyone knows how to change the setting for Google
Groups, I'd appreciate the information.

>At the current time, if you send an email out now you
>have no idea if anyone got it.

Actually, there's an archive of all the messages at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/scvlp
It includes your recent posting.

However, the presence of something in the archive only
proves that the mailing list got the material for
distribution.  It doesn't tell you whether the material
got delivered to (or rejected or spam-filtered by)any
particular subscriber or their mail service.

...
>This may be adding to the confusion.

That's a good point.  The collateral damage of the Yahoo and
AOL decisions to deploy certain DMARC options is still being
assessed; mailing lists and forwarding services are both at
risk.  There are a bunch of variables.  If there's a specific
case of concern, please don't hesitate to let me know about
the particulars.

Randy